| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
09/09/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
30/09/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
FALZON, L.C.; O´NEILL, T.J.; MENZIES, P.I.; PEREGRINE, A.S.; JONES-BITTON, A.; VANLEEUWEN, J.; MEDEROS, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
AMERICA ESTHER MEDEROS SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors associated with anthelmintic resistance in sheep. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2014, v. 117, p. 388-402. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.07.003 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 5 March 2014; Received in revised form 27 May 2014; Accepted 3 July 2014. |
|
Contenido : |
Background: Anthelmintic drugs have been widely used in sheep as a cost-effective meansfor gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) control. However, growing anthelmintic resistance(AHR) has created a compelling need to identify evidence-based management recommen-dations that reduce the risk of further development and impact of AHR.Objective: To identify, critically assess, and synthesize available data from primary researchon factors associated with AHR in sheep.Methods: Publications reporting original observational or experimental research on selectedfactors associated with AHR in sheep GINs and published after 1974, were identified throughtwo processes. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Agricola, CAB) and Web of Science (acollection of databases) were searched for potentially relevant publications. Additional pub-lications were identified through consultation with experts, manual search of referencesof included publications and conference proceedings, and information solicited from smallruminant practitioner list-serves. Two independent investigators screened abstracts for rel-evance. Relevant publications were assessed for risk of systematic bias. Where sufficientdata were available, random-effects Meta-Analyses (MAs) were performed to estimate thepooled Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of AHR for factors reported in?2 publications.Results: Of the 1712 abstracts screened for eligibility, 131 were deemed relevant for fullpublication review. Thirty publications describing 25 individual studies (15 observationalstudies, 7 challenge trials, and 3 controlled trials) were included in the qualitative synthesisand assessed for systematic bias. Unclear (i.e. not reported, or unable to assess) or high riskof selection bias and confounding bias was found in 93% (14/15) and 60% (9/15) of theobservational studies, respectively, while unclear risk of selection bias was identified in allof the trials. Ten independent studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, and MAswere performed for five factors. Only high frequency of treatment was a significant riskfactor (OR = 4.39; 95% CI = 1.59, 12.14), while the remaining 4 variables were marginallysignificant: mixed-species grazing (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 0.66, 4.07); flock size (OR = 1.02; 95%CI = 0.97, 1.07); use of long-acting drug formulations (OR = 2.85; 95% CI = 0.79, 10.24); anddrench-and-shift pasture management (OR = 4.08; 95% CI = 0.75, 22.16). MenosBackground: Anthelmintic drugs have been widely used in sheep as a cost-effective meansfor gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) control. However, growing anthelmintic resistance(AHR) has created a compelling need to identify evidence-based management recommen-dations that reduce the risk of further development and impact of AHR.Objective: To identify, critically assess, and synthesize available data from primary researchon factors associated with AHR in sheep.Methods: Publications reporting original observational or experimental research on selectedfactors associated with AHR in sheep GINs and published after 1974, were identified throughtwo processes. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Agricola, CAB) and Web of Science (acollection of databases) were searched for potentially relevant publications. Additional pub-lications were identified through consultation with experts, manual search of referencesof included publications and conference proceedings, and information solicited from smallruminant practitioner list-serves. Two independent investigators screened abstracts for rel-evance. Relevant publications were assessed for risk of systematic bias. Where sufficientdata were available, random-effects Meta-Analyses (MAs) were performed to estimate thepooled Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of AHR for factors reported in?2 publications.Results: Of the 1712 abstracts screened for eligibility, 131 were deemed relevant for fullpublication review. Thirty publications... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
DRENCH RESISTANCE; EVIDENCE-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS; GASTRO-INTESTINAL NEMATODES; MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS. |
|
Thesagro : |
OVINOS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03419naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1050071
005 2019-09-30
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.07.003$2DOI
100 1 $aFALZON, L.C.
245 $aA systematic review and meta-analysis of factors associated with anthelmintic resistance in sheep.
260 $c2014
500 $aArticle history: Received 5 March 2014; Received in revised form 27 May 2014; Accepted 3 July 2014.
520 $aBackground: Anthelmintic drugs have been widely used in sheep as a cost-effective meansfor gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) control. However, growing anthelmintic resistance(AHR) has created a compelling need to identify evidence-based management recommen-dations that reduce the risk of further development and impact of AHR.Objective: To identify, critically assess, and synthesize available data from primary researchon factors associated with AHR in sheep.Methods: Publications reporting original observational or experimental research on selectedfactors associated with AHR in sheep GINs and published after 1974, were identified throughtwo processes. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Agricola, CAB) and Web of Science (acollection of databases) were searched for potentially relevant publications. Additional pub-lications were identified through consultation with experts, manual search of referencesof included publications and conference proceedings, and information solicited from smallruminant practitioner list-serves. Two independent investigators screened abstracts for rel-evance. Relevant publications were assessed for risk of systematic bias. Where sufficientdata were available, random-effects Meta-Analyses (MAs) were performed to estimate thepooled Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of AHR for factors reported in?2 publications.Results: Of the 1712 abstracts screened for eligibility, 131 were deemed relevant for fullpublication review. Thirty publications describing 25 individual studies (15 observationalstudies, 7 challenge trials, and 3 controlled trials) were included in the qualitative synthesisand assessed for systematic bias. Unclear (i.e. not reported, or unable to assess) or high riskof selection bias and confounding bias was found in 93% (14/15) and 60% (9/15) of theobservational studies, respectively, while unclear risk of selection bias was identified in allof the trials. Ten independent studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, and MAswere performed for five factors. Only high frequency of treatment was a significant riskfactor (OR = 4.39; 95% CI = 1.59, 12.14), while the remaining 4 variables were marginallysignificant: mixed-species grazing (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 0.66, 4.07); flock size (OR = 1.02; 95%CI = 0.97, 1.07); use of long-acting drug formulations (OR = 2.85; 95% CI = 0.79, 10.24); anddrench-and-shift pasture management (OR = 4.08; 95% CI = 0.75, 22.16).
650 $aOVINOS
653 $aDRENCH RESISTANCE
653 $aEVIDENCE-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS
653 $aGASTRO-INTESTINAL NEMATODES
653 $aMANAGEMENT PRACTICES
653 $aQUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS
700 1 $aO´NEILL, T.J.
700 1 $aMENZIES, P.I.
700 1 $aPEREGRINE, A.S.
700 1 $aJONES-BITTON, A.
700 1 $aVANLEEUWEN, J.
700 1 $aMEDEROS, A.
773 $tPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2014$gv. 117, p. 388-402.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
20/06/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
21/02/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Informes Agroclimáticos |
|
Autor : |
GIMENEZ, A.; CASTAÑO, J.; CAL, A.; TISCORNIA, G.; SCHIAVI, C. |
|
Afiliación : |
AGUSTIN EDUARDO GIMENEZ FUREST, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSE PEDRO CASTAÑO SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ADRIAN TABARE CAL ALVAREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS IGNACIO SCHIAVI RAMPELBERG, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Informe Agroclimático 2015 - Situación a Abril. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2015. |
|
Páginas : |
4 p. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Palabras claves : |
AGROCLIMA; AGROCLIMATOLOGÍA; BOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO; CARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA; DIRECCION VIENTO; ESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS; ESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS; ESTACIONES INIA; ESTADO DEL TIEMPO; ESTRÉS HÍDRICO; GRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS; GRAS; HELIOFANOGRAFO; INFORMACION SATELITAL; INUNDACIONES; LLUVIAS DIARIAS; MAXIMA; MEDIA; MINIMA; PANEL SOLAR; PERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS; PLUVIOMETRO; PRECIPITACION NACIONAL; PREVENCION HELADAS; PRONOSTICO; SENSOR; SIMETRICO; TANQUE A; TERMOCUPLAS; TERMOHIDROGRAFO; VARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS; VELETA. |
|
Thesagro : |
AGROCLIMATOLOGIA; CAMBIO CLIMATICO; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; ESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS; ESTRES HIDRICO; EVAPORACION; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; HUMEDAD; HUMEDAD RELATIVA; LLUVIA; METEOROLOGIA; PERSPECTIVAS; PLUVIOMETROS; PRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO; SENSORES; SISTEMAS; SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION; SUELO; TEMPERATURA; TERMOMETROS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P40 Meteorología y climatología |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4746/1/Inf.Agr.-abril-2015.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02064nam a2200793 a 4500
001 1052902
005 2018-02-21
008 2015 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d
100 1 $aGIMENEZ, A.
245 $aInforme Agroclimático 2015 - Situación a Abril.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2015
300 $a4 p.
650 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGIA
650 $aCAMBIO CLIMATICO
650 $aCLIMA
650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA
650 $aESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS
650 $aESTRES HIDRICO
650 $aEVAPORACION
650 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION
650 $aHUMEDAD
650 $aHUMEDAD RELATIVA
650 $aLLUVIA
650 $aMETEOROLOGIA
650 $aPERSPECTIVAS
650 $aPLUVIOMETROS
650 $aPRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO
650 $aSENSORES
650 $aSISTEMAS
650 $aSISTEMAS DE INFORMACION
650 $aSUELO
650 $aTEMPERATURA
650 $aTERMOMETROS
653 $aAGROCLIMA
653 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGÍA
653 $aBOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO
653 $aCARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA
653 $aDIRECCION VIENTO
653 $aESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS
653 $aESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS
653 $aESTACIONES INIA
653 $aESTADO DEL TIEMPO
653 $aESTRÉS HÍDRICO
653 $aGRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS
653 $aGRAS
653 $aHELIOFANOGRAFO
653 $aINFORMACION SATELITAL
653 $aINUNDACIONES
653 $aLLUVIAS DIARIAS
653 $aMAXIMA
653 $aMEDIA
653 $aMINIMA
653 $aPANEL SOLAR
653 $aPERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS
653 $aPLUVIOMETRO
653 $aPRECIPITACION NACIONAL
653 $aPREVENCION HELADAS
653 $aPRONOSTICO
653 $aSENSOR
653 $aSIMETRICO
653 $aTANQUE A
653 $aTERMOCUPLAS
653 $aTERMOHIDROGRAFO
653 $aVARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS
653 $aVELETA
700 1 $aCASTAÑO, J.
700 1 $aCAL, A.
700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G.
700 1 $aSCHIAVI, C.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
